The final post in a three-part series on The Fairfield County Community Foundation's efforts to improve the lives of families in Connecticut.Read more
The second post in a three-part series on The Fairfield County Community Foundation's efforts to improve the lives of families in Connecticut.Read more
The first post in a three-part series on The Fairfield County Community Foundation's efforts to improve the lives of families in Connecticut.Read more
We are excited for 2014! Here's a look at what we're doing and how you can plug in.Read more
What We Can Do:
- Increase TANF Payments to Protect Families from Homelessness
- Support Families with the Greatest Needs by Removing Barriers to TANF
- Strengthen Connections Among Welfare-to-work, Job Training, and Homeless Assistance Programs
- Use TANF to Provide Rapid Re-housing and Emergency Housing Assistance
- Use TANF to Create Subsidized Jobs and Provide Work Supports for Families Living in Poverty
You may also be interested in
Most states determine TANF payment rates solely through family composition. However, seven U.S. states use both location and family composition to determine TANF payment rates. These states include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The following outlines the location variances in Virginia for a family of three:
Maximum TANF Payment
|Accomack, Alleghany, Amelia, Amherst, Appomattox, Bath, Bedford, Bland, Botetourt, Brunswick, Buchanan, Buckingham, Campbell, Caroline, Carroll, Charles City, Charlotte, Clarke, Craig, Culpeper, Cumberland, Dickenson, Dinwiddie, Essex, Fauquier, Floyd, Fluvanna, Franklin, Frederick, Giles, Gloucester, Goochland, Grayson, Greene, Greensville, Halifax, Hanover, Henry, Highland, Isle of Wight, James City, King and Queen, King George, King William, Lancaster, Lee, Louisa, Lunenburg, Madison, Mathews, Mecklenburg, Middlesex, Nelson, New Kent, Northampton, Northumberland, Nottoway, Orange, Page, Patrick, Pittsylvania, Powhatan, Prince Edward, Prince George, Pulaski, Rappahannock, Richmond, Rockbridge, Russell, Scott, Shenandoah, Smyth, Southampton, Spotsylvania, Stafford, Surry, Sussex, Tazewell, Washington, Westmoreland, Wise and Wythe||$292.00|
|Albemarle, Chesterfield, Henrico, Loudoun, Roanoke, Rockingham and Warren||$320.00|
|Arlington, Augusta, Fairfax, Montgomery, Prince William and York||$389.00|
Most states determine TANF payment rates solely through family composition. However, seven U.S. states use both location and family composition to determine TANF payment rates. These states include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The following outlines the location variances in Illinois for a family of three:
Maximum TANF Payment
|Boone, Champaign, Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, Ogle, Whiteside,Winnebago, Woodford||$432.00|
|Adams, Bureau, Carroll, Clinton, Coles, DeWitt, Douglas, Effingham, Ford, Fulton, Grundy, JoDaviess, Knox, LaSalle, Henry, Iroquois, Jackson, Lee, Livingston, Logan, Macon, Macoupin, Madison, McLean, McDonough, Mercer, Monroe, Morgan, Moultrie, Peoria, Piatt, Putnam, Rock Island, Sangamon, St. Clair, Stephenson, Tazewell, Vermilion, Wabash, Warren, Will||$417.00|
|Alexander, Bond, Brown, Calhoun, Cass, Christian, Clark, Clay, Crawford, Cumberland, Edgar, Edwards, Fayette, Franklin, Gallatin, Greene, Hamilton, Hancock, Hardin, Henderson, Jasper, Jefferson, Jersey, Johnson, Lawrence, Marion, Marshall, Mason, Massac, Menard, Montgomery, Perry, Pike, Pope, Pulaski, Randolph, Richland, Saline, Schuyler, Scott, Shelby, Stark, Union, Washington, Wayne, White, Williamson||$399.00|
Most states determine TANF payment rates solely through family composition. However, seven U.S. states use both location and family composition to determine TANF payment rates. These states include California, Connecticut, Illinois, Kansas, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. The following outlines the location variances in Pennsylvania for a family of three:
|Counties||Maximum TANF Payment|
|Bucks, Chester, Lancaster, Montgomery and Pike||$421.00|
|Adams, Allegheny, Berks, Blair, Bradford, Butler, Centre, Columbia, Crawford, Cumberland, Dauphin, Delaware, Erie, Lackawanna, Lebanon, Lehigh, Lazeme, Lycoming, Monroe, Montour, Northampton, Philadelphia, Sullivan, Susquehanna, Union, Warren, Wayne. Westmoreland, Wyoming and York||$403.00|
|Beaver, Cameron, Carbon, Clinton, Elk, Franklin, Indiana, Lawrence, McKean, Mercer, Mifflin, Perry, Potter, Snyder, Tioga, Venago and washington||$393.00|
|Armstrong, Bedford, Cambria, Clarion, Clearfield, Fayette, Forest, Fulton, Greene, Huntington, Jefferson, Juniata, Northumberland, Schuylikill and Somerset||$365.00|
Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) serves very few poor families — only one in four families living in poverty. Furthermore, TANF payments are very low and their value has eroded over time as most states have not adjusted TANF payments to account for inflation.
Today, in every state, a family that relies entirely on TANF for income cannot cover the cost of fair market rent. Often public policies, government programs, research and advocacy focused on family homelessness are not connected with policies, programs, research and advocacy focused on welfare to work programs or poverty.
Funders can, however, play an important role in addressing the gap between state TANF benefits and Fair Market Rents, as well as strengthening the relationship between state TANF programs and housing programs.
Now is the time to build coalitions linking advocates working to end homelessness with advocates working to strengthen the safety net TANF payments and other benefits can provide for needy families.
What can funders do?
Educate state policymakers and the public about the connections between family homelessness, housing costs, and inadequate TANF benefits for families with children
Provide meeting space, host forums, and offer support to facilitate public education and coalition building to build shared knowledge and effective advocacy for changes in TANF policies that can contribute to solutions to family homelessness
Provide challenge grants to match investments of TANF funding in programs designed to help prevent and end family homelessness, including rapid re-housing, housing stabilization supports, and subsidized jobs
Support research and evaluation to measure the impact of TANF-funded programs that provide assistance tailored to the needs of homeless families
What state-level changes to TANF can funders support?
Increase TANF payments to recover the lost value and to cover the cost of rental housing and protect families from homelessness. States should also establish cost of living adjustments based on inflation so benefits do not lose their value
Use TANF funds to provide rapid re-housing assistance and housing stabilization support services for families experiencing homelessness
Reduce or remove administrative barriers and modify work participation requirements and other program rules that can result in excluding the most vulnerable families from TANF programs
Create or expand subsidized and transitional jobs that provide meaningful opportunities for work and the development of skills and experience that can lead to better employment opportunities
Provide more flexible work supports that are tailored to the needs of families experiencing or at risk of homelessness, including childcare, transportation assistance, and services to address employment barriers related to limited education and the effects of trauma, mental health, and substance use disorders
Strengthen the connections among welfare-to-work, job training and homeless assistance programs to pursue shared goals and strategies and to facilitate linkages for families in need
To learn more about TANF policies and why the safety net for poor families has weakened in recent years, we recommend:
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Administration’s TANF Information Memorandum
- TANF Cash Benefits Continued To Lose Value in 2013
- TANF Emerging from the Downturn a Weaker Safety Net: State-By-State Fact Sheets
- TANF Emerging from the Downturn a Weaker Safety Net