A national network of funders supporting strategic, innovative, and effective solutions to homelessness

Preventing Youth Homelessness: Lessons from International Advocates

International Conference on the Prevention of Youth Homelessness plenary session image

In February, Casey Trupin from Raikes Foundation and Daisy Vazquez from Porticus, both members of Funders Together, attended the first-ever Prevention of Youth Homelessness International Conference and describe key takeaways for U.S. philanthropy in this blog post.

By Daisy Vazquez, Porticus; Casey Trupin, Raikes Foundation; and Michael Durham, Funders Together to End Homelessness

Co-hosted by A Way Home Canada (the model for A Way Home America) and the Canadian Observatory on Homelessness, the first-ever Prevention of Youth Homelessness International Conference reflected the culmination of Canada’s Making the Shift campaign, a comprehensive initiative that aims to divert the field’s focus from crisis response to prevention. The majority of the nearly 600 attendees who gathered in Toronto in February represented Canadian programs, advocacy, and research, and were joined by representatives from across the globe, including promising work in Wales and Australia, for example. US colleagues contributed as well with remarks from former U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness (USICH) director Jeff Olivet and presentations by Point Source Youth and Covenant House. 

One main takeaway was simply that this event even happened. This conference signifies that the emergent focus on youth homelessness prevention is a global movement and that other countries can demonstrate genuine progress. Dr. Steve Gaetz, Scientific Director for the Making the Shift campaign, said that he was expecting that this conference would serve the purpose of persuading attendees that prevention is necessary. Instead, he found that few needed convincing. They were ready to share what they’d learned and build a cohesive international movement.


Major Themes from International Partners

Despite varying definitions of prevention, the focus of programs described throughout the conference pertained to interventions in particular sites, namely schools, families, and state care.

For example, The Geelong Project in Australia (known as Upstream in North America and the UK), has demonstrated profound success by deploying a universal screening tool in schools and matching children who are at risk of losing their housing with appropriate support services. 

We were especially intrigued with the Family and Natural Supports (FNS) initiatives presented in a range of sessions. Recognizing that a majority of young people who have been homeless cite family conflict and/or abuse as the reason they left home, FNS includes a range of services that promote healing and restoration within families, such as therapy and mediation, but also financial support for parents/guardians. Success does not exclusively entail staying with families when abuse and conflict cannot be resolved but embraces a broader understanding of kinship to ensure young people remain connected in loving homes, including chosen family.

While several sessions pertained to interventions in particular institutions, like carceral settings or child welfare facilities, there appeared to be universal recognition that the overall intention of prevention is to stop children and youth from interacting with any of these systems at all. The further you go upstream, the more that prevention interventions in different sectors merge with one another. Economic stability and community integration prevent not just homelessness but also school dropouts, incarceration, etc.


Comparisons to the U.S. Movement

No doubt our Canadian colleagues are far ahead in their nationwide efforts to shift from crisis response alone. The proliferation of programs like Upstream and FNS, in addition to the vast body of research on the subject, attests to this. Reflecting on the U.S. movement, we noted how our thinking is so enculturated into crisis response that we struggle to imagine working outside of our current systems. Some partners suggested a “prevention” intervention in shelters, which would, by definition, only reach young people who are already precariously housed. Comprehensive prevention would obviate shelters altogether.

Casey Trupin presents at the International Prevention of Youth Homelessness ConferenceCasey Trupin of the Raikes Foundation presents at the Prevention of Youth Homelessness International Conference

It is worth noting that the Upstream Project does exist in the United States, but it remains just a handful of time-limited pilots, each of which struggles for sustainable funding and keeping non-homelessness-system partners at the table. And any screening tool that identifies risk factors relies on the availability of appropriate services, namely housing, to succeed. All the same, initiatives like Upstream are not rocket science. They just seem ambitious because they hardly exist here in the States.

That said, the U.S. leads the way in using flexible financial assistance to prevent homelessness. While the Toronto conference did include some financial assistance interventions, the American movement for cash and universal basic income is a model for others.


Opportunities for U.S. Philanthropy

Prevention of homelessness, especially for young people but not exclusively, represents rare common ground between the stereotypical left and right in U.S. politics. For example, as Amanda Andere, CEO of Funders Together once said, when we’re talking about abolitionist policies, we’re mostly talking about prevention. Abolitionist strategy attends to the root causes of harm such that punitive responses are revealed to be obsolete. But this speaks to conservative values as well. It is a far more efficient use of resources to prevent homelessness in the first place and keep young people from interacting with public systems than to wait until they’ve experienced profound trauma. Moreover, while the work of ending youth homelessness often implies a focus on unaccompanied young people (who are disconnected from their families of origin), prevention necessarily requires engagement with parents and families, biological or otherwise. Prevention promotes kinship and familial connection, what some might call family values.

While other nations may lead the way specific to youth, prevention of homelessness across populations is gaining traction stateside, as evidenced by California Policy Lab’s Homelessness Prevention Conference that took place the same week. It behooves us to connect this emerging focus with our youth-specific movement.

We can do this by leveraging philanthropy’s influence to ensure prevention gets the spotlight in our sector’s various homelessness conferences. We can incentivize our national youth homelessness partners to focus more on prevention through our grantmaking. And since the Making the Shift campaign in Canada is sunsetting, with no plans for another international prevention conference, perhaps we can use our convening power to host the next one. We must keep up the momentum.


Recommendations for Philanthropy

  • As homelessness response systems in the U.S. increasingly include homelessness prevention, ensure that prevention interventions are tailored to meet the needs of specific populations such as youth and young adults.
  • Effective prevention of youth/young adult homelessness requires collaboration between different sectors (e.g., education, youth workforce programs, family services, housing). Philanthropy can incentivize this by supporting cross-sector collaborations and funding innovative cross-sector pilots that are focused on youth homelessness prevention.
  • Broaden the application of successful models (e.g., Upstream Project and Family and Natural Supports) to other related systems that touch youth and young adults. For example, identify other youth systems (such as juvenile-legal, youth workforce programs, community colleges) that could implement key elements of these models to identify and support youth at risk of homelessness.


Additional Resources


Showing 1 reaction

  • Michael Durham
    published this page in Blog 2025-04-02 13:19:12 -0400

We joined Funders Together because we believe in the power of philanthropy to play a major role in ending homelessness, and we know we have much to learn from funders across the country.

-Christine Marge, Director of Housing and Financial Stability at United Way of Greater Los Angeles

I am thankful for the local partnerships here in the Pacific Northwest that we’ve been able to create and nurture thanks to the work of Funders Together. Having so many of the right players at the table makes our conversations – and all of our efforts – all the richer and more effective.

-David Wertheimer, Deputy Director at Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Very often a lack of jobs and money is not the cause of poverty, but the symptom. The cause may lie deeper in our failure to give our fellow citizens a fair chance to develop their own capacities, in a lack of education and training, in a lack of medical care and housing, in a lack of decent communities in which to live and bring up their children.

-President Lyndon B. Johnson, 1964 State of the Union Address

Funders Together has given me a platform to engage the other funders in my community. Our local funding community has improved greatly to support housing first models and align of resources towards ending homelessness.

-Leslie Strnisha, Vice President at Sisters of Charity Foundation of Cleveland

Our family foundation convenes local funders and key community stakeholders around strategies to end homelessness in Houston. Funders Together members have been invaluable mentors to us in this effort, traveling to our community to share their expertise and examples of best practices from around the nation.

-Nancy Frees Fountain, Managing Director at The Frees Foundation


Sign in with Facebook, Twitter or email.